Management of oral anticoagulant therapy in a dedicated anticoagulation clinic is associated with low rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications in real-world practice, even in elderly outpatients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dedicated anticoagulation clinics for low VKA complication rates; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
Over past years, there has been a world-wide increase in oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of OAT managing in a real-practice situation. Nine hundred and three consecutive unselected patients referred for the control of OAT to the Anticoagulation Clinic of the University of Florence were studied. The total follow-up period was 1679 patient-years. The rate of total, major and fatal bleeding events was 5.0, 1.1 and 0.06 per 100 patient-years, respectively. In patients with a target International Normalized Ratio (INR) > or = 3, a significantly higher rate of bleeding (P = 0.02) with respect to patients with a target INR < 3 was observed. The rate of all thrombotic events was 3.8 per 100 patient-years. The rate of major and fatal thrombotic events were 2.4 and 0.4 per 100 patient-years, respectively. At INR >/= 4.5 the rate of bleeding was significantly higher (P = 0.005) than at lower INR. At INR < 2 the rate of all thrombotic events was significantly higher (P = 0.00001) with respect to more elevated intensities of anticoagulation. A low incidence of complications may be obtained even in elderly outpatients on OAT followed at an anticoagulation clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poli et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: