Key result
A single-pill combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine reduced left ventricular mass index more than a free combination of the same drug classes (-8.3% vs -2.0%, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Little was known about the effects on LVMI of a single-pill triple fixed-dose combination therapy containing an ACEI, a diuretic, and a CCB.
Does a single-pill triple fixed-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine improve left ventricular mass index reduction compared to free combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension?
RCT (n=92)
Open-label
randomized
Does a single-pill triple fixed-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine improve left ventricular mass index reduction compared to free combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: -8.3% vs -2%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
A single-pill triple combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine provides greater reduction in left ventricular mass index and blood pressure variability compared to free combination therapy in hypertensive patients.
May favor single-pill combinations for LVH regression; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Most antihypertensive drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy reduce the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). However, little is known about the effects on LVMI of a triple fixed-dose combination (TFC) therapy, containing in a single pill an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker (CCB). METHODS: In this prospective open-label study, 92 patients with essential hypertension were randomized to treatment with a TFC of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine at different doses or a triple free combination therapy (FCT) including ACEI/diuretic/CCB. Office blood pressure (BP) measurement, 24 h-ambulatory BP monitoring and echocardiography were performed at baseline and during a 14-month follow-up. The BP variability (BPV) over 24 h was calculated as ± standard deviation of the daytime systolic BP. Differences between office and monitored BP and LVMI were evaluated by ANOVA for repeated measures. RESULTS: A significant BP-lowering effect was observed for both treatments. At follow-up, BPV was reduced in both the treatment groups vs. the baseline (14.0±1.5 vs. 17.0±1.8 and 16.2±2.1 vs. 17.6±2.3, respectively), but it was lower in the TFC vs. the FCT group (14.0±1.5 vs. 16.1±2.2, P < 0.05). LVMI was lower in both the treatment groups, but the change was greater for TFC vs. FCT (-8.3±4.9% vs. -2.0 ±2.1%, P < 0.0001). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression was greater in the TFC vs. the FCT group (43.5% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Independently of BP values achieved, the antihypertensive TFC therapy was more effective than FCT in LVMI reduction and LVH regression, possibly related to drugs' intrinsic properties and to BPV modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazza et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in essential hypertension (n=92). perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination vs. triple free combination therapy (FCT) including ACEI/diuretic/CCB was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=< 0.0001). A single-pill combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine reduced left ventricular mass index more than a free combination of the same drug classes (-8.3% vs -2.0%, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: