Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied the pattern transfer fidelity of nanoimprint lithography (NIL) by patterning sub-micron MESFET gates on six-inch wafers. The critical dimensions (CD) of the gate patterns on the mould, imprinted in resist, as well as after oxygen reactive ion etching (RIE) and metal lift-off were measured, separately, using an ultrahigh-resolution scanning electron microscope. Comparison of the measurements reveals that the as-imprinted gates in resist are 5.2% (or 37 nm) on average larger than those on the mould with a standard deviation of 1.2% (or 8 nm), and the gates after oxygen RIE and metal lift-off are 42% (or 296 nm) on average larger than those on the mould with a standard deviation of 8% (or 30 nm). Compared with photolithography, NIL has better pattern transfer fidelity with CD controls about four times smaller.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: