Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an attempt to define the spatial relationships among SERCA1a transmembrane helices M4, M5, M6, and M8, involved in Ca2+ binding, all six cysteine residues were removed from predicted transmembrane sequences by substitution with Ser or Ala. The cysteine-depleted protein retained 44% of wild type Ca2+ transport activity. Pairs of cysteine residues were then reintroduced to determine whether their juxtaposition would result in the formation of disulfide cross-links between transmembrane helices. In initial studies designed to map the juxtaposition of Ca2+ binding residues, Cys was substituted for Glu309 or Gly310 in transmembrane sequence M4, in combination with the substitution of Cys for Glu771 in M5; for Asn796, Thr799, or Asp800 in M6; or for Glu908 in M8. These double mutants all retained the capacity to form a phosphoenzyme intermediate from Pi (but not from ATP in the presence of Ca2+), and in all but mutants E309C/N796C and G310C/N796C, phosphoenzyme formation was insensitive to 100 microM Ca2+. These results support the view that both Glu309 and Asn796 contribute to Ca2+ binding site II, which is not required for conversion of E2, the substrate for Pi phosphorylation, to E1. Cross-linking in mutants E309C/N796C and G310C/D800C established reference points for the orientation of M4 and M6 relative to each other and provided the basis for the prediction of potential additional cross-links. Strong links were formed with the pairs T317C/A804C and T317C/L807C near the cytoplasmic ends of the two helices and with A305C/L792C and A305C/L793C near the lumenal ends. These combined results support the conclusion that M4 and M6 form a right-handed coiled-coil structure that forms part of the pathway of Ca2+ translocation. In addition to providing a possible explanation for the mutation sensitivity of several pairs of residues in these helices, the proposed association of M4 and M6 supports a new model for the orientation of the two Ca2+ binding sites among transmembrane helices M4, M5, and M6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rice et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: