Key result
An acute 5-day reduction in physical activity in healthy men decreased insulin sensitivity (11.3 to 8.0, P<0.05) and increased peak postprandial glucose (113 to 123 mg/dL, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does an acute reduction in daily physical activity impair insulin-stimulated blood flow and glycemic control in healthy men?
Does an acute reduction in daily physical activity impair insulin-stimulated blood flow and glycemic control in healthy men?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 11.3%
p-value: p=<0.05
A 5-day reduction in physical activity impairs glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in healthy men, which is not driven by changes in insulin-stimulated blood flow and is not reversed by a single day of returning to normal activity.
Short inactivity may impair glycemic control even in healthy adults; hypothesis-generating for sedentary effects and reversal timelines.
PURPOSE: Insulin-stimulated increases in skeletal muscle blood flow play a role in glucose disposal. Indeed, 7 d of aerobic exercise in patients with Type 2 diabetes increased blood flow responses to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and improved insulin sensitivity. More recent work suggests that reduced daily physical activity impairs glycemic control (GC) in healthy individuals. Herein, we sought to determine whether an acute reduction in daily activity (from >10,000 to <5000 steps per day) for 5 d (RA5) in healthy individuals reduced insulin-stimulated blood flow and GC in parallel and if a 1-d return to activity (RTA1) improved these outcomes. METHODS: OGTT were performed as a stimulus to increase insulin in 14 healthy, recreationally active men (24 ± 1.1 yr) at baseline, RA5, and RTA1. Measures of insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) and femoral and brachial artery blood flow were made during the OGTT. Free-living measures of GC including peak postprandial glucose (peak PPG) were also made via continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: Femoral and brachial artery blood flow increased during the OGTT but neither was significantly impacted by changes in physical activity (P > 0.05). However, insulin sensitivity was decreased by RA5 (11.3 ± 1.5 to 8.0 ± 1.0, P < 0.05). Likewise, free-living GC measures of peak PPG (113 ± 3 to 123 ± 5 mg·dL(-1), P < 0.05) was significantly increased at RA5. Interestingly, insulin sensitivity and GC as assessed by peak PPG were not restored after RTA1 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, acute reductions in physical activity impaired GC and insulin sensitivity; however, blood flow responses to an OGTT were not affected. Further, a 1-d return to activity was not sufficient to normalize GC after 5 d of reduced daily physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynolds et al. (2014) studied Healthy (n=14). Acute reduction in daily physical activity vs. Baseline (>10,000 steps per day) was evaluated on Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) (p=<0.05). An acute 5-day reduction in physical activity in healthy men decreased insulin sensitivity (11.3 to 8.0, P<0.05) and increased peak postprandial glucose (113 to 123 mg/dL, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: