Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the effects of increasing physical activity on arterial stiffness during hyperglycemia.
Does a short-term increase in physical activity prevent the increase in arterial stiffness during hyperglycemia in glucose-intolerant elderly?
Does a short-term increase in physical activity prevent the increase in arterial stiffness during hyperglycemia in glucose-intolerant elderly?
A short-term (1-month) increase in daily physical activity suppresses the acute increase in arterial stiffness following glucose intake in glucose-intolerant elderly individuals.
Increasing daily activity may blunt post-glucose arterial stiffness in glucose-intolerant elderly; hypothesis-generating, larger trials needed before practice change.
We examined the effects of increasing physical activity on arterial stiffness during hyperglycemia. Nineteen glucose-intolerant elderly participated in the study. We randomly assigned 10 participants to increase their daily activity in everyday life, regardless of the time or intensity, for 1 month (PAI group) (age, 74.6 ± 1.3 years; mean ± SE) and nine participants to maintain their level of activity (CON group) (age, 79.2 ± 2.1 years; mean ± SE). The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was conducted in each participant in both groups before and after the start of the intervention to confirm glucose intolerance. Brachialankle pulse wave velocity and cardio-ankle vascular index significantly increased from baseline at 30, 60, and 90 min after the 75-g glucose ingestion after the intervention in the CON group (p<0.05), but not in the PAI group. Heartbrachial pulse wave velocity did not change compared to baseline after the 75-g glucose ingestion in either group and did not change from baseline at 30, 60, and 90 min after the 75-g glucose ingestion before and after the intervention in both groups. The present findings indicate that a short-term increase in physical activity suppresses the increase in arterial stiffness after glucose intake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: