Anastomotic devices can facilitate rapid, reproducible anastomoses in coronary artery surgery, potentially mitigating the hazards of manual construction in challenging conditions.
Anastomotic devices should not yet alter CABG practice; leaves open their role pending randomized outcome data.
Excellent long-term graft patency remains the primary goal of any surgical coronary revascularization procedure, irrespective of how the operation itself is performed. Inter- and intra-surgeon variability in the surgical technique and in the subsequent quality of the anastomosis have the potential to significantly impact not only on graft patency but also, as a result, on patient outcomes. Anastomotic devices, proximal and distal, can facilitate the creation of rapid, reproducible, compliant anastomoses, on- or off-pump, in potentially difficult-to-access areas, often through minimal-access incisions, potentially with neuro-protective benefits, and can thus mitigate some of the hazards inherent in manually constructing anastomoses in technically challenging or suboptimal conditions. We review the three most commonly employed anastomotic devices in adult cardiac surgical practice today.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: