Key result
This review summarizes available preclinical and clinical data for anastomotic devices in coronary artery bypass grafting, focusing on surgical outcomes, patency rates, and anticoagulation needs.
This review summarizes available preclinical and clinical data on anastomotic devices for coronary artery bypass grafting, focusing on surgical outcomes, patency rates, and anticoagulation requirements.
Evidence on anastomotic devices in CABG remains preliminary; leaves open optimal device selection and trial design for routine adoption.
With the advent of off-pump and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting, efforts to facilitate construction of the graft to coronary anastomosis have increased. As a result, a number of anastomotic devices have been developed. While the ideal anastomotic device should be easy to use, produce a geometrically optimal anastomosis with minimal endothelial damage and minimal blood-exposed nonintimal surface, a number of design constraints apply. This review collects the available preclinical and clinical data for some of the devices, with special regard as to surgical outcome, patency rate and the need for additional perioperative anticoagulation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falk et al. (2005) conducted a review in Coronary artery bypass grafting. Anastomotic devices was evaluated. This review summarizes available preclinical and clinical data for anastomotic devices in coronary artery bypass grafting, focusing on surgical outcomes, patency rates, and anticoagulation needs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: