Why the study?
Does arterial counterpulsation improve long-term outcomes in patients with acute severe heart failure complicating myocardial infarction?
Does arterial counterpulsation improve long-term outcomes in patients with acute severe heart failure complicating myocardial infarction?
Arterial counterpulsation provides important supportive therapy in complicated myocardial infarction, particularly when intervention is prompt or mechanical complications are corrected early.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports targeted arterial counterpulsation in preshock or mechanical-complication shock post-MI; leaves open benefit in isolated power failure.
Thirty patients were discharged from hospital after treatment with arterial counterpulsation for acute severe heart failure complicating myocardial infarction. Seventeen patients had been in cardiogenic shock--13 with power failure alone, and 4 with a mechanical complication which required corrective surgery. Thirteen patients were in impending or 'preshock'. The follow-up period after infarction averaged 13-1 months. Results were good in 'preshock' patients, and in shocked patients with a surgically correctable mechanical complication. Results were poor in shocked patients with power failure alone. Counterpulsation has an important supportive role in the treatment of complicated myocardial infarction, provided that intervention is prompt and mechanical complications, if present, are corrected early.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baron et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: