This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A suite of six metallacycles ( 1 – 6 ) was generated via coordination-driven self-assembly using the three dicarboxylate-bridged arene–Ru precursors [Ru 2 (μ-η 4 -OO∩OO)(η 6 - p - i PrC 6 H 4 Me) 2 ][CF 3 SO 3 ] 2; (OO∩OO = oxalate ( A1 ), 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonato (dobq) ( A2 ), 5,8-dihydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinonato (donq) ( A3 ); CF 3 SO 3 = triflate) with one of two dipyridyl ligands ( L1 and L2 ). The metallacycles were isolated in excellent yield (86–92%) as triflate salts and characterized by proton ( 1 H) and carbon-13 ( 13 C) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) to confirm their structural assignments. Single-crystal X-ray crystal analysis of 1 revealed that two L1 ligands bridged two A1 acceptors to form a rectangular architecture. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was conducted to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicities relative to two chemotherapeutic agents: namely, cisplatin and doxorubicin. Metallacycles 3 and 6 potently inhibited the growth of HCT-15 human colon and AGS human gastric cancer cells. The hollow fiber (HF) assay was performed to investigate the in vivo antitumor activities of metallacycles 3 and 6 . Metallacycle 6 was more effective in inhibiting HCT-15 cells than metallacycle 3 in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, 3 and 6 induced autophagic activity in HCT-15 cells. These results suggested that the autophagic response elicited by metallacycles 3 and 6 could mediate the anticancer effects observed in human colorectal cancer cells.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubey et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: