Why the study?
Does posterior aortic wall echocardiogram assessment of LAEI correlate with R-R interval to evaluate LV diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does posterior aortic wall echocardiogram assessment of LAEI correlate with R-R interval to evaluate LV diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Assessment of R-R interval-LAEI relation using posterior aortic wall echocardiogram is useful for noninvasive evaluation of LV diastolic function and determining optimal heart rate in atrial fibrillation.
May inform noninvasive LV diastolic assessment in AF; leaves open prospective validation for rate optimization.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function was performed on 12 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using posterior aortic wall echocardiogram and a parameter for determining the optimal heart rate in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation was considered. METHODS: Subjects were divided into two groups; one with no underlying cardiac disease (AF only group; n = 7) and the other with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM group; n = 5). Left atrial emptying index (LAEI) obtained from the posterior aortic wall echocardiogram was used as the parameter of LV diastolic function, and R-R interval-LAEI relation and minimum R-R interval showing LAEI = 1.0 were investigated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between R-R interval and LAEI until LAEI of 1.0 was obtained in all patients. Slope of the regression line was significantly steeper in the AF only group than in the DCM group, and minimum R-R interval showing LAEI = 1.0 was significantly shorter in the AF only group. CONCLUSION: Assessment of R-R interval-LAEI relation was useful for the noninvasive evaluation of LV diastolic function, and this parameter could be used for clinical application to determine the optimal heart rate in atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nobuoka et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: