Why the study?
Does sequential AV pacing (DVI mode) improve peak aortic arch blood flow velocity compared to VVI mode in patients with pacemakers?
Does sequential AV pacing (DVI mode) improve peak aortic arch blood flow velocity compared to VVI mode in patients with pacemakers?
Doppler echocardiography provides a simple, noninvasive method to estimate increments in stroke volume and cardiac output obtained with sequential AV pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DVI pacing may increase peak aortic velocities versus VVI in select pacemaker patients; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized trials.
Six patients with sequential atrioventricular pacemakers were studied by Doppler echocardiography. A commercially available continuous wave system (transcutaneous aortovelography) was used and the transducer was placed in the suprasternal notch and angled to obtain peak aortic arch blood flow velocity. Changes in Doppler peak velocity have been previously shown to correlate closely and reliably with changes in hemodynamically measured stroke volume/cardiac output in the same patients following interventions. In all patients, the pacemaker was programmed from DVI mode to VVI (heart rate was kept constant) and then back to DVI, with the Doppler transducer held in a fixed position all the time, and peak velocities measured after the patient had been in any particular mode for at least 1 minute. Five of 6 patients showed reduction in peak velocities ranging from 13-25% (mean 18.4%) when the pacing mode was switched from DVI to VVI. Doppler peak velocity remained unchanged in 1 patient. Doppler echocardiography represents a simple, noninvasive method for estimating increments in stroke volume/cardiac output obtained with sequential AV pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanda et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: