Key result
Biomarker risk scores match or outperform the ACC ASCVD Estimator for predicting CAD and diabetes.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use UK Biobank data to train predictors for 65 blood and urine markers such as HDL, LDL, lipoprotein A, glycated haemoglobin, etc. from SNP genotype. For example, our Polygenic Score (PGS) predictor correlates ∼0.76 with lipoprotein A level, which is highly heritable and an independent risk factor for heart disease. This may be the most accurate genomic prediction of a quantitative trait that has yet been produced (specifically, for European ancestry groups). We also train predictors of common disease risk using blood and urine biomarkers alone (no DNA information); we call these predictors biomarker risk scores, BMRS. Individuals who are at high risk (e.g., odds ratio of >5× population average) can be identified for conditions such as coronary artery disease (AUC∼0.75), diabetes (AUC∼0.95), hypertension, liver and kidney problems, and cancer using biomarkers alone. Our atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) predictor uses ∼10 biomarkers and performs in UKB evaluation as well as or better than the American College of Cardiology ASCVD Risk Estimator, which uses quite different inputs (age, diagnostic history, BMI, smoking status, statin usage, etc.). We compare polygenic risk scores (risk conditional on genotype: PRS) for common diseases to the risk predictors which result from the concatenation of learned functions BMRS and PGS, i.e., applying the BMRS predictors to the PGS output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widén et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Common diseases (e.g., coronary artery disease, diabetes). Machine learning predictors (BMRS and PGS) vs. American College of Cardiology ASCVD Risk Estimator was evaluated on Disease risk prediction. Biomarker risk scores alone identified individuals at high risk for coronary artery disease (AUC~0.75) and diabetes (AUC~0.95), performing as well as or better than the ACC ASCVD Risk Estimator.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: