The authors challenge the conclusion that Nav1.5 channels are almost excluded from the lateral membrane compartment of cardiomyocytes, highlighting discrepancies with prior studies.
Not only we have read with great interest the recent study by Verkerk et al . 1 , but we were also impressed by the originality of their experimental approach. In this study, macropatch recordings were conducted from the lateral membranes of rabbit cardiomyocytes or from intercalated disc areas. Both regions exhibited fast transient sodium currents. However, the current was 8.5 times larger at intercalated discs. Fifty nanomolar tetrodotoxin (TTX) did not block the intercalated disc current, but inhibited it at the lateral membranes, suggesting that the latter current is mediated by neuronal-type voltage-gated sodium (Na v ) channels that are TTX-sensitive. Recently, we planed to perform similar experiments to study the mechanisms underlying the targeting and anchoring of the ‘cardiac’ isoform of the sodium channel, Na v 1.5, to the lateral membranes vs. intercalated discs of cardiomyocytes. Specifically, we wanted to investigate this point in dystrophin-deficient mice as we observed that in myocytes from this mouse strain, the whole-cell sodium current was decreased by ∼50% compared with wild-type cells. 2 Since dystrophin is exclusively found at the lateral membranes, we hypothesized that only Na v 1.5 channels found in this compartment are down-regulated in dystrophin-deficient myocytes. 2 However, Verkerk et al. conclude that almost no Na v 1.5 channels are present in this lateral membrane compartment. The discussion by Verkerk et al. is well balanced and points to possible limitations of their technical approach. Here, we would like to address a point that has not been explicitly discussed. On the basis of a commonly admitted model of a cardiomyocyte, 3 one may consider a ventricular myocyte as a cylinder 100 µm in length and 11 µm in radius. The intercalated disc area would be ∼760 µm 2 , and the lateral membrane area ∼6910 µm 2 , thus ∼9 times larger than the intercalated disc area. In Fig. 1 of Verkerk et al. , 1 the ‘quasi-macroscopic’ currents obtained at the lateral membrane were ∼70 pA and ∼600 pA at the intercalated discs. If we extrapolate these values, the current generated by channels from the lateral membrane would be about the same amplitude as compared with intercalated discs (∼483'700 pA vs. 456'000 pA per unit of area under the pipette). This would mean that the contribution of TTX-sensitive neuronal-type Na v s in cardiomyocytes is comparable to the one of Na v 1.5 channels, and that these channels are almost excluded from the lateral membrane compartment. These conclusions contrast with the observations made by several groups indicating that TTX-sensitive-neuronal channels account only for 5–14% of total sodium current in ventricular myocytes in various species. 4 Furthermore, recent studies using different specific anti-Na v 1.5 antibodies provided evidence that this channel is also found in lateral membranes. 5 , 6 The points we are raising here are significant since it is clear that Na v 1.5 is playing an important role in many different genetic and, most likely, acquired cardiac diseases. The study by Verkerk et al.1 is an important one since it shows the feasibility to investigate the distinct membrane localizations of Na v channels, but it also raises further interesting questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petitprez et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: