Safety and efficacy of anti‐tachycardia pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy implanted with an ICD

BACKGROUND: In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), clinical outcomes of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) have been poorly explored. In a retrospective analysis of a cohort of consecutive HCM patients implanted with an ICD, we aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and clinical value of ATP. METHODS: The cohort of HCM patients implanted with a transvenous ICD and followed in our center was assessed for device intervention from implantation to last clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Overall 77 patients (45 males; mean age: 46 ± 16 years) were analyzed. After 67 ± 41 months, 24 patients had 49 ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) appropriately treated (5.8% per year). Among 39 monomorphic VTs, ATP was effective in 27 (success rate: 69%). Mean time from VT onset to ATP delivery was 9.1 ± 4.9 s. The only clinical variable improving ATP success was use of beta-blockers (81% vs 50%; P = .04). Out of 12 ineffectively treated VTs, one was immediately shocked, four self-terminated after 18 ± 12 s, and seven (18%) were accelerated to a new VT. ATP was also delivered for 27 of 42 inappropriately detected episodes and induced two de novo VTs (7%). In the per patient analysis, 14 out 77 (18%) patients had one or more appropriate and effective ATP (3.4% per year), and only six (8%; 1.4% per year) received more than one ATP. CONCLUSION: ATP is moderately effective for the treatment of monomorphic VTs in HCM patients. However, the rate of appropriate ATP therapies is low, ATP is often prematurely delivered, and ATP-induced arrhythmia degeneration is of concern.