Key result
ATP terminates ~62% of fast ventricular tachycardia episodes, regardless of coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
The efficacy of anti-tachycardia pacing for terminating fast ventricular tachycardia in ICD patients with different etiologies, especially in Japanese patients, was unclear.
Does anti-tachycardia pacing effectively terminate fast ventricular tachycardia in Japanese ICD patients regardless of underlying etiology?
Observational (n=715)
Yes
Does anti-tachycardia pacing effectively terminate fast ventricular tachycardia in Japanese ICD patients regardless of underlying etiology?
Anti-tachycardia pacing is equally effective for terminating fast ventricular tachycardia in Japanese ICD patients with and without coronary artery disease etiology.
ATP efficacy for fast VT in Japanese ICD patients requires confirmation; leaves open whether CAD-based data generalize across etiologies.
BACKGROUND: Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) safely avoids painful shocks with minimum risk of tachycardia acceleration. The etiology of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in those studies, however, was predominantly coronary artery disease (CAD). Patient etiology differs by geography and could affect ATP efficacy rate. The primary objective of this study was to examine how often the first ATP therapy terminates fast VT (FVT) in Japanese ICD patients with regional etiologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifteen patients received ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator with the function of ATP during capacitor charging. The primary endpoint was the first ATP success rate for terminating FVT with cycle length 240-320 ms. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 months, 888 spontaneous VT episodes were detected, including 276 FVT (31.1%) in 42 patients. The first-ATP success rate for FVT in the overall group (41% CAD, 59% non-CAD including 23% idiopathic VT) was 62.1% (61.7% adjusted). Success rate was not different between non-CAD and CAD patients (61.4% adjusted and 57.5% adjusted, respectively, P=0.75). Eight FVT episodes (2.9%) accelerated after the first ATP attempt, all of which were terminated by subsequent device therapy (additional ATP or shock). CONCLUSIONS: ATP efficacy for FVT was similar between ICD patients with and without CAD etiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Fast ventricular tachycardia (n=715). Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) was evaluated on Success rate of initial anti-tachycardia pacing for terminating fast ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 240-320 ms) (95% CI 54.0-68.9). Anti-tachycardia pacing successfully terminated fast ventricular tachycardia in 61.7% of episodes, with similar efficacy observed between patients with and without coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: