Why the study?
Chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2 has a complex pathophysiology, prompting this study to assess renal function using biomarkers associated with nephron injury sites following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve renal function biomarkers in patients with chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve renal function biomarkers in patients with chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2?
Novel biomarkers such as sPGD2S, uACR, uCysC, and uNGAL are more sensitive than serum creatinine and eGFR in evaluating renal function changes following cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with cardiorenal syndrome type 2.
CRT response may link to distinct biomarker patterns in CRS-T2; leaves open whether it improves renal outcomes.
Background Chronic cardiorenal syndrome type 2 (CRS-T2) has a complex pathophysiology. The objective of this study was to assess renal function using biomarkers associated with nephron injury sites in patients with CRS-T2 following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods The research included patients with heart failure in NYHA classes II-IV, in whom CRT devices had been implanted. After 3 months of follow-up, the research group was divided into CRT responders and CRT non-responders. Prior to CRT and after 3 months, renal function was assessed using biomarkers measured in urine and blood samples. Results CRT was implanted in 56 patients (aged 66 ± 10 years) with CRS-T2 in the course of coronary artery disease (n = 38; 67.9%) or dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 18). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR CKD-EPI ) was 68.55 ± 20.34 mL/min/1.73m 2 . After three months follow-up CRT responder group were assessed showing a significant decrease in serum prostaglandin D2 synthase (sPGD2S) and albuminuria (uACR) concentrations. Urine samples of the CRT non-responder group showed significant (p <0.05) increases in lipocalin associated with neutrophil gelatinase (uNGAL) concentrations, and a decrease in cystatin C (uCysC) concentration. There were no significant changes in the concentration of serum creatinine (sCr), CysC and eGFR CKD-EPI between the CRT responders and CRT non - responders groups. Conclusions The sCr and eGFR CKD-EPI assessment are useless in evaluation of renal function three months after CRT implantation. Biomarkers that account for the pathophysiology of nephron injury in CRS-T2 and change significantly after CRT are: sPGD2S, uACR, uCysC, and uNGAL. Trial registration This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04516525. Registered 15 August 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516525.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gala‐Błądzińska et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: