Why the study?
Does family history of vasovagal syncope increase the likelihood of vasovagal syncope in offspring?
Does family history of vasovagal syncope increase the likelihood of vasovagal syncope in offspring?
Family history and female sex are significant predictors of vasovagal syncope, with maternal history increasing risk for all offspring and paternal history increasing risk specifically for sons.
Parental syncope history may aid risk stratification in vasovagal syncope; leaves open whether family-based interventions alter outcomes.
AIMS: To determine the effect of family history on the likelihood of vasovagal syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two medical students and 228 first-degree relatives were studied. Vasovagal syncope was ascertained with the Calgary syncope symptom score. The effects of the sex of the subject and parental syncope history on the likelihood of offspring fainting were described using Kaplan-Meier estimates and analysed using proportional hazards regression. The prevalence of vasovagal syncope was 32% and the median age of first faint in those who fainted was 14 years. More females than males fainted [42 vs. 31%; P=0.02; hazard ratio (HR) 1.34 (95% CI 1.07-1.68)]. An individual with two fainting parents was more likely to faint than one with no fainting parents [P<0.0001; HR 3.4 (95% CI 1.7-7.03)]. In the proportional hazards model, offspring of either sex whose mother faints are more likely to faint than those whose mother does not faint [HR 2.86 (95% CI 1.54-5.31)]. Having a father who faints significantly increases the risk of syncope in sons [HR 4.12 (95%CI 1.39-12.31)], but not in daughters [HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.56-3.34)]. CONCLUSION: Family history and sex of subject are important predictors of vasovagal syncope in offspring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serletis et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: