Why the study?
Interpretation of cardiovascular response tests varies among observers, prompting an evaluation of cardiovascular responses to commonly used tests and their applicability in clinical situations.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
These tests may aid athlete and occupational evaluations; leaves open standardization and clinical validation.
Several tests are available for assessing cardiovascular response to various interventions which may be given in the laboratory, or outside of it in the field. The tests are meant to excite or deactivate cardiovascular and other sensory receptors which signal the central mechanisms. They have been found useful in generating data to study cardiovascular effects on subjects exposed to specialized physical training (e.g., athletes), in the evaluation of people engaged in special occupations such as pilots, astronauts, and other military personnel, and in training undergraduate and postgraduate students. If the response does not fit into the physiological norm, it may reflect a temporary aberration, or a more serious defect in the cardiovascular control mechanism because of disease. Interpretation of data generated may vary between various operators/observers. Here, an attempt has been made to bring out responses of the cardiovascular system to the commonly used tests, and their applicability in clinical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohan B Dikshit (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: