Why the study?
Is it feasible and valid to measure concurrent stress and arousal using experience sampling and Holter monitoring in individuals with psychosis?
Is it feasible and valid to measure concurrent stress and arousal using experience sampling and Holter monitoring in individuals with psychosis?
A novel methodology combining experience sampling and Holter monitoring is feasible and valid for assessing real-world stress and arousal in patients with psychosis.
Supports real-world stress-arousal monitoring feasibility in psychosis; hypothesis-generating for autonomic links and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Psychosis has been repeatedly suggested to be affected by increases in stress and arousal. However, there is a dearth of evidence supporting the temporal link between stress, arousal, and psychosis during "real-world" functioning. This paucity of evidence may stem from limitations of current research methodologies. Our aim is to the test the feasibility and validity of a novel methodology designed to measure concurrent stress and arousal in individuals with psychosis during "real-world" daily functioning. METHOD: Twenty patients with psychosis completed a 36-hour ambulatory assessment of stress and arousal. We used experience sampling method with palm computers to assess stress (10 times per day, 10 AM → 10 PM) along with concurrent ambulatory measurement of cardiac autonomic regulation using a Holter monitor. The clocks of the palm computer and Holter monitor were synchronized, allowing the temporal linking of the stress and arousal data. We used power spectral analysis to determine the parasympathetic contributions to autonomic regulation and sympathovagal balance during 5 minutes before and after each experience sample. RESULTS: Patients completed 79% of the experience samples (75% with a valid concurrent arousal data). Momentary increases in stress had inverse correlation with concurrent parasympathetic activity (ρ = -.27, P < .0001) and positive correlation with sympathovagal balance (ρ = .19, P = .0008). Stress and heart rate were not significantly related (ρ = -.05, P = .3875). CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility and validity of our methodology in individuals with psychosis. The methodology offers a novel way to study in high time resolution the concurrent, "real-world" interactions between stress, arousal, and psychosis. The authors discuss the methodology's potential applications and future research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimhy et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: