Why the study?
Does levosimendan improve myocardial contractility without exacerbating arrhythmias in a pig model of ischemia and reperfusion?
Does levosimendan improve myocardial contractility without exacerbating arrhythmias in a pig model of ischemia and reperfusion?
In a pig model of ischemia-reperfusion, levosimendan improved cardiac output and contractility but increased the incidence of ischemic arrhythmias.
May enhance output in ischemia-reperfusion yet raise arrhythmia risk; leaves open net benefit in clinical translation.
OBJECTIVE To determine whether levosimendan, a calcium sensitiser that facilitates the activation of the contractile apparatus by calcium, improves myocardial contractile function during severe ischaemia and reperfusion without exacerbating the incidence of arrhythmias. DESIGN Pigs were pretreated orally twice daily for 10 days with 0.08 mg/kg levosimendan or placebo. On day 11 the left main coronary artery was ligated for 30 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. A bolus dose of levosimendan, 11.2 μg/kg intravenously, or placebo was given 30 minutes before coronary ligation, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2 μg/kg/min levosimendan or placebo for the remainder of the experiment. RESULTS During the ischaemic period, cardiac output was higher in the levosimendan group than in the placebo group (mean (SD): 2.6 (0.5) v 2.0 (0.2) l/min, p < 0.05) and systemic vascular resistance was lower (2024 (188) v 2669 (424) dyne.s −1 .cm −5 , p < 0.005). During reperfusion, cardiac output and contractility (LV max dP/dt (pos), 956 (118) v 784 (130) mm Hg/s, p < 0.05) were increased by levosimendan. The incidence of ischaemic ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia was similar in the two groups but there were more arrhythmic events (ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) in the levosimendan treated group (8/12 levosimendan v 1/9 control p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Levosimendan improved cardiac output and myocardial contractility during coronary artery ligation and reperfusion. However, it increased the number of arrhythmic events during ischaemia in this model of in vivo regional ischaemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toit et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: