Why the study?
Disparities in CVD mortality and risk factors between urban and rural regions are confirmed worldwide, but how living in different community types across childhood and adulthood relates to CVD risk factors and surrogate markers remained to be examined.
Does living in urban areas compared to rural areas improve cardiovascular risk factors and surrogate markers of CVD in a Finnish cohort?
Does living in urban areas compared to rural areas improve cardiovascular risk factors and surrogate markers of CVD in a Finnish cohort?
Participants living continuously in urban areas in Finland demonstrated a more favorable cardiovascular risk factor profile and less subclinical atherosclerosis compared to rural residents.
Urban-rural differences in childhood/adult residence linked to CV risk profiles; leaves open targeted prevention trials in rural populations.
Aims: Disparity in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and risk factor levels between urban and rural regions has been confirmed worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine how living in different community types (urban–rural) in childhood and adulthood are related to cardiovascular risk factors and surrogate markers of CVD such as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and left ventricular mass (LVM). Methods: The study population comprised 2903 participants (54.1% female, mean age 10.5 years in 1980) of the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study who had been clinically examined in 1980 (age 3–18 years) and had participated in at least one adult follow-up (2001–2011). Results: In adulthood, urban residents had lower systolic blood pressure (–1 mmHg), LDL-cholesterol (–0.05 mmol/l), lower body mass index (–1.0 kg/m 2 ) and glycosylated haemoglobin levels (–0.05 mmol/mol), and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome (19.9 v. 23.7%) than their rural counterparts. In addition, participants continuously living in urban areas had significantly lower IMT (–0.01 mm), LVM (1.59 g/m 2.7 ) and pulse wave velocity (–0.22 m/s) and higher carotid artery compliance (0.07%/10 mmHg) compared to persistently rural residents. The differences in surrogate markers of CVD were only partially attenuated when adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: Participants living in urban communities had a more favourable cardiovascular risk factor profile than rural residents. Furthermore, participants continuously living in urban areas had less subclinical markers related to CVD compared with participants living in rural areas. Urban–rural differences in cardiovascular health might provide important opportunities for optimizing prevention by targeting areas of highest need.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuotio et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: