Key result
Rural residence was associated with higher rates of hypertension (37.1% vs 30.9%; RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.13-1.27) and other cardiometabolic risks, which were completely attenuated by social risk factors.
Why the study?
Little was known about the current state of rural cardiovascular health and the underlying drivers of rural-urban disparities in the US.
Does rural residence increase the prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases in US adults compared to urban residence?
Population
27 172 US adults aged 20 years or older
Comparison
Rural vs urban residence based on county-level rurality
Design
Nationally representative cross-sectional study
Authors
Loading...
Rural CV disparities merit policy focus; cross-sectional data leaves causal drivers and interventions open.
Cross-Sectional (n=27,172)
Yes
Does rural residence increase the prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases in US adults compared to urban residence?
Relative Risk: 1.2 (95% CI 1.13–1.27)
Absolute Event Rate: 37.1% vs 30.9%
Substantial rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular health exist in the US, particularly among young adults, and are primarily driven by social risk factors rather than healthcare access or lifestyle.
Liu et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases (n=27,172). County-level rurality vs. Urban residence was evaluated on Age-standardized rates of cardiometabolic risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and diabetes) and cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease and stroke) (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.13-1.27). Rural residence was associated with higher rates of hypertension (37.1% vs 30.9%; RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.13-1.27) and other cardiometabolic risks, which were completely attenuated by social risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: