Why the study?
Does an artificial neural network based on synchronic HRV series from ECG and PPG accurately classify obstructive sleep apnea compared to expert clinical diagnosis?
Does an artificial neural network based on synchronic HRV series from ECG and PPG accurately classify obstructive sleep apnea compared to expert clinical diagnosis?
A neural network algorithm using synchronized HRV data from ECG and PPG signals can highly accurately classify obstructive sleep apnea.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-accuracy HRV-based neural network classification of OSA is hypothesis-generating; larger prospective validation is required before clinical consideration.
In the present study, "obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients" and "non-OSA patients" were classified into two groups using with two synchronic heart rate variability (HRV) series obtained from electrocardiography (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals. A linear synchronization method called cross power spectrum density (CPSD), commonly used on HRV series, was performed to obtain high-quality signal features to discriminate OSA from controls. To classify simultaneous sleep ECG and PPG signals recorded from OSA and non-OSA patients, various feed forward neural network (FFNN) architectures are used and mean relative absolute error (MRAE) is applied on FFNN results to show affectivities of developed algorithm. The FFNN architectures were trained with various numbers of neurons and hidden layers. The results show that HRV synchronization is directly related to sleep respiratory signals. The CPSD of the HRV series can confirm the clinical diagnosis; both groups determined by an expert physician can be 99% truly classified as a single hidden-layer FFNN structure with 0.0623 MRAE, in which the maximum and phase values of the CPSD curve are assigned as two features. In future work, features taken from different physiological signals can be added to define a single feature that can classify apnea without error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akşahin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: