Key result
Artificial neural networks and wavelet packet decomposition of the HRV signal achieved 95% accuracy in classifying normal subjects versus severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients.
Why the study?
Advancements in telecommunication technologies offer promising alternatives for remote diagnosis, including identifying obstructive sleep apnea syndrome via ECG signal analysis.
Does artificial neural network analysis of HRV signals accurately identify and classify Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
Observational
No
Does artificial neural network analysis of HRV signals accurately identify and classify Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial neural networks using HRV signal features can accurately identify and classify the severity of obstructive sleep apnea from ECG data.
The advancement of telecommunication technologies has provided us with new promising alternatives for remote diagnosis and possible treatment suggestions for patients of diverse health disorders, among which is the ability to identify Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome by means of Electrocardiograph (ECG) signal analysis. In this paper, the standard spectral bands’ powers and statistical interval-based parameters of the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) signal were considered as a form of features for classifying the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) database for OSA syndrome into 4 different levels. Wavelet packet analysis was applied to obtain and estimate the standard frequency bands of the HRV signal. Further, the single perceptron neural network, the feedforward with back-propagation neural network and the probabilistic neural network have been implemented in the classification task. The classification between normal subjects versus severe OSA patients achieved 95% accuracy with the probabilistic neural network. While the classification between normal subjects versus mild OSA subjects reached accuracy of 95% also. When grouping mild, moderate and severe OSA subjects in one group compared to normal subjects as a second group, the classification with the feedforward network achieved an accuracy of 87.5%. Finally, when classifying subjects directly into one of the four classes (normal or mild or moderate or severe), a 77.5% accuracy was achieved with the feedforward network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossen et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome. Artificial neural networks and wavelet packet decomposition of the HRV signal vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Classification accuracy between normal subjects and severe OSA patients. Artificial neural networks and wavelet packet decomposition of the HRV signal achieved 95% accuracy in classifying normal subjects versus severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: