Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores the apparent contradictions of the FSLN 's commitment to both ‘restoring’ women's rights regarding violence against women and promoting C hristian family values and reconciliation. It proposes an explanation based on the state's use of moral regulation to make a personified patriarchal social order seem normal by encouraging consent and, when necessary, applying coercion. Improved formal recognition of rights is belied by the continued inappropriate use of mediation and other practices that blame women, naturalise violence, and contribute to aggressors' impunity. Furthermore, the government has sanctioned aggressive tactics against feminists and women's organisations, who counter this social order with active citizenship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadine Jubb (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: