Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have carried out a quantitative analysis of ER-alpha and ER-beta mRNA expression in normal (n = 11) and breast cancer (n = 112) tissues using a real-time (Taq-Man) PCR assay. Expression of ER-beta mRNA variants has also been studied by triple-primer PCR assay. ER-alpha mRNA levels in normal breast tissues were significantly (p < 0.01) lower than those in ER-positive breast cancers but not significantly different from those in ER-negative breast cancers. However, ER-beta mRNA levels in normal breast tissues were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers. Proportions of ER-beta1 and ER-beta2 mRNA expression among total ER-beta mRNA expression were significantly higher and those of ER-beta5 and ER-beta5; mRNA were significantly lower in normal breast tissues than in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers. ER-beta mRNA levels and proportions of ER-beta mRNA variants did not show any significant correlation with age, tumor size, lymph node status and histological grade. Our results demonstrate that ER-alpha mRNA is up-regulated and ER-beta mRNA is down-regulated during carcinogenesis of breast cancers. Changes in proportions of ER-beta mRNA variants are also implicated in this process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwao et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: