Why the study?
Data are equivocal whether sex differences in training responsiveness occur, prompting investigation into potential sex differences in hemodynamic responses to high-intensity interval exercise.
Are there sex differences in the hemodynamic response to high-intensity interval exercise in habitually active adults?
Are there sex differences in the hemodynamic response to high-intensity interval exercise in habitually active adults?
There are no significant sex differences in relative hemodynamic responses to high-intensity interval exercise, suggesting that previously reported differences in VO2max response to HIIE are not driven by unique hemodynamic responses.
Similar relative SV/CO responses to HIIE across sexes; leaves open mechanisms of reported sex differences in training adaptations.
Sex differences in the cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic response to exercise exist due to differences in heart size, blood volume, and hemoglobin mass, eliciting higher maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) in men versus women. Data are equivocal whether sex differences in training responsiveness occur. This study investigated potential sex differences in the hemodynamic response (stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO)) to high‐intensity interval exercise (HIIE). Habitually active men ( n = 15) and women ( n = 13) underwent VO 2max testing, followed by three HIIE sessions consisting of the 4 × 4, 10 × 1, and reduced exertion high‐intensity training (REHIT), whose order was randomized. During exercise, oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and hemodynamic responses were determined. Results showed no sex difference in peak relative VO 2 ( p = 0.263), CO ( p = 0.277), or SV ( p = 0.116), although absolute values were higher in men ( p < 0.05). Peak absolute (127.3 ± 20.6 vs. 115.2 ± 16.6 mL/beat, p = 0.004, d = 0.66) and relative SV (111.0 ± 15.5 vs. 100.7 ± 11.1% max, p = 0.005, d = 0.78) were higher with REHIT versus 4 × 4. No sex differences in mean relative VO 2 , CO, or SV occurred ( p > 0.05). Data showed lower mean VO 2 during REHIT versus 4 × 4 (59.3 ± 6.8 vs. 65.8 ± 5.8 %VO 2max , p < 0.001, d = 1.05) and 10 × 1 (59.3 ± 6.8 vs. 69.1 ± 7.4 %VO 2max , p < 0.001, d = 1.4). Mean CO was lower in REHIT than 10 × 1 (79.8 ± 8.6 vs. 84.0 ± 7.4% max, p = 0.012, d = 0.53). Previously reported differences in VO 2max response to HIIE may not be due to unique hemodynamic responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coe et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: