Why the study?
Humans are exposed to daily indoor and outdoor temperature differences, but the associated risks to health and fatigue remain unclear.
Does repeated short-term exposure to temperature differences increase psychophysiological loads in healthy individuals?
Does repeated short-term exposure to temperature differences increase psychophysiological loads in healthy individuals?
Repeated exposure to environmental temperature steps increases autonomic nervous system load and subjective fatigue, which can be quantified using a Bayesian state-space model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeated temperature steps enhance autonomic load in healthy volunteers; leaves open translation to clinical fatigue or health risks in daily life.
Humans are exposed to daily temperature differences indoors and outdoors worldwide; however, the associated risks to health and fatigue remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the psychophysiological loads by repeated short-term temperature differences on Japanese individuals. Herein, 28 healthy individuals were repeatedly moved between two temperature environments, and their psychological/physiological responses to temperature differences in the environment were recorded [T26-26 (control), T26-31 (5 °C step), T26-36 (10 °C step), and T21-36 (15 °C step)]. We precisely estimated the accumulated effects (load) of repeated temperature steps using a Bayesian state-space model, and distinguished them from the direct effects of environmental changes. The Load to the autonomic nervous system was continuously enhanced (decreased high-frequency of RRI and increased low-frequency/high-frequency of RRI) in the trials with temperature steps, while it was less under the T21-36 (15 °C step) than under the T26-36 (10 °C step) condition. These findings could help formulate fatigue management approaches and recommend best practices to minimise adverse health effects related to sudden and uncontrollable environmental temperature steps/changes in everyday scenarios on the public.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwasaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: