Why the study?
LV maximal wall thickness is a key factor in SCD risk for HCM, but the effect of substituting MRI-measured MWT for echocardiography-measured MWT in the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator was unknown.
Does measuring maximal left ventricular wall thickness by MRI compared to echocardiography change the calculated 5-year sudden cardiac death risk category in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does measuring maximal left ventricular wall thickness by MRI compared to echocardiography change the calculated 5-year sudden cardiac death risk category in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Using MRI instead of echocardiography to measure maximal wall thickness in HCM patients significantly alters the calculated 5-year sudden cardiac death risk, reclassifying up to 14% of patients.
Differences in MWT by imaging modality may alter individual SCD risk estimates in HCM; leaves open whether MRI should supplant echo in the Risk-SCD calculator.
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk according to the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator when MWT measured using echocardiography was changed to MWT measured using MRI. All consecutive patients with HCM who underwent cardiac MRI were included. MWT measured with echocardiography and MRI were compared, and 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator was computed using four different models. The final population included 673 patients [389 (57.8%) males, median age 50 years, interquartile range (36-60)]. The median MWT was lower measured by echocardiography than by MRI [20 (17-24) mm vs 21 (18-24) mm; p < 0.0001]. There was agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the measurement of maximal LV wall thickness in 96 patients (14.3%). The largest differences between echo and MRI were - 13 mm and + 9 mm. The differences in MWT by echocardiography and MRI translated to a maximal difference of 8.33% in the absolute 5-year risk of SCD, i.e., the echocardiography-based risk was 8.33% lower than the MRI-based estimates. Interestingly, 13.7% of patients would have been reclassified into different SCD risk categories if MRI had been used to measure MWT instead of echocardiography. In conclusion, although there was high general intermodality agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the MWT measurements, the differences in MWT translated to significant differences in the 5-year risk of SCD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Śpiewak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: