Why the study?
Anastomotic leak is a serious complication following colorectal surgery, prompting study to identify associated factors and analyze its impact on survival.
What are the predictive factors for anastomotic leak and its impact on survival in adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection?
What are the predictive factors for anastomotic leak and its impact on survival in adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection?
Anastomotic leak following curative colorectal cancer resection is associated with reduced 5-year overall survival in rectal cancer patients, with specific risk factors including emergency surgery, public hospital setting, open approach, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and male gender.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform AL risk stratification in colorectal resections; leaves open causal survival effects pending prospective validation.
Introduction: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of AL and to analyze its impact on survival. Materials and methods: All consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections performed between 2007 and 2020 with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: There were 6837 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.2% and 4.0% in patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (odds ratio 2.293, p = 0.009). Emergency surgery (p = 0.015), surgery at a public hospital (p = 0.002), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.021) were all associated with a significantly higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (4.4% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In rectal cancer patients, AL was associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.038) and male gender (p = 0.002). The anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn vs. stapled) did not impact the rate of AL (p = 0.116 and p = 0.198 with colon and rectal cancer, respectively). Discussion: Clinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and should consider early intervention for at-risk patients. .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prabhakaran et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: