Why the study?
Is two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) feasible for evaluating myocardial strain in consecutive, nonselected patients in daily clinical practice?
Is two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) feasible for evaluating myocardial strain in consecutive, nonselected patients in daily clinical practice?
Longitudinal strain analysis using 2DSTE is highly feasible in routine clinical practice, whereas radial and circumferential strain assessments are less reliable and highly dependent on operator experience.
Longitudinal strain by 2DSTE may be prioritized in routine care; leaves open reliability of radial and circumferential strain in unselected patients.
PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the feasibility of two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) in evaluating myocardial strain in consecutive, nonselected patients in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Strain analysis using 2DSTE was attempted in 59 consecutive patients: 24 patients with severe aortic stenosis, 28 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 7 healthy controls. The analysis was done by four expert echocardiographers and one cardiology resident. RESULTS: It was possible to obtain reliable data for radial strain in 175 of 354 segments (49%), circumferential strain in 192 of 354 segments (54%), and longitudinal strain in 319 of 354 segments (90%). Experienced echocardiographers felt assessment of radial and circumferential strain was appropriate in more segments than did the cardiology resident (57% and 58% vs. 23% and 40%, respectively, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Longitudinal strain analysis with 2DSTE is feasible in most segments, but the radial and circumferential strain evaluation was only feasible in approximately half of the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villanueva et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: