Why the study?
Does a 150-J biphasic truncated exponential shock provide equivalent first-shock defibrillation efficacy compared to a 200-J monophasic damped sine shock in patients with electrically-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
Population
96 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing for ventricular arrhythmias or testing of an implantable…
Comparison
150-joule impedance-compensated, 200-microF… vs Historical control group treated with 200-J…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Supports 150-J BTE for VF; leaves open confirmation of equivalence and outcomes in randomized trials.
Does a 150-J biphasic truncated exponential shock provide equivalent first-shock defibrillation efficacy compared to a 200-J monophasic damped sine shock in patients with electrically-induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias?
Lower-energy (150-J) biphasic shocks provide equivalent first-shock defibrillation efficacy to 200-J monophasic shocks for electrically-induced VF, while delivering significantly less peak current.
Susan A. Higgins (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: