Why the study?
Does preinduction incentive spirometry improve apnea tolerance compared to deep breathing in adult patients with abdominal sepsis undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Does preinduction incentive spirometry improve apnea tolerance compared to deep breathing in adult patients with abdominal sepsis undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Preoperative incentive spirometry significantly improves apnea tolerance and oxygenation compared to deep breathing during anesthesia induction in patients with abdominal sepsis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preinduction incentive spirometry in abdominal sepsis laparotomy; extends RCT evidence for apnea optimization to emergency settings.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal sepsis is associated with varied degree of hypoxemia and atelactasis in the lung and can enhance the onset of desaturation of arterial blood during apnea. AIMS: This study looked at methods to improve safety margin of apnea during induction of anesthesia in these high-risk patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: It was a randomized, single blind study on adult patients presenting for emergency laparotomy due to peritonitis in a university teaching hospital setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In group 1 (IS) (n = 32), three sessions of incentive spirometry (IS) were performed within one hour before induction of anesthesia. In group 2 (DB) (n = 34), patients were subjected to deep breathing sessions in a similar manner. All patients received preoxygenation (100%) by mask for 3 min, followed by rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia using fentanyl, thiopental, and suxamethonium and endotracheal intubation. Patients were subjected to a period of apnea by keeping the end of the endotracheal tube open to air till they developed 95% hemoglobin saturation (SpO 2) by pulse oxymetry. Positive pressure ventilation was resumed at the end. We observed for hemodynamic changes, apnea time, and SpO 2 (100%) recovery time on resuming ventilation. Arterial blood gas samples were taken before intervention, after IS or DB, after preoxygenation, and at the end of apnea. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), X 2 test, Kaplan-Meier graph, and log-rank tests were applied to compare the two study groups. RESULTS: Oxygenation level in group 1 (265 ± 76.7 mmHg) patients was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than in group 2 (221 ± 61.8 mmHg)at the end of preoxygenation. The apnea time (median: lower bound - upper bound Confidence Interval apnea time) (272:240-279 s) in group 1 (IS) patients was significantly higher P < 0.05) than in group 2 (180:163-209 s) patients. Saturation recovery time (35:34-46 s) in group 1 (IS) patients was also quicker than in group 2 patients (48:44-58 s). CONCLUSIONS: IS in the preoperative period is superior to deep breathing sessions for improving apnea tolerance during induction of anesthesia in abdominal sepsis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: