Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we study quasiconformal curves which are a special case of quasiregular curves. Namely embeddings <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> Ω → {{R}}ᵐ from some domain <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> <m:mo>⊂</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> Ω ⊂ {{R}}ⁿ to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {{R}}ᵐ , where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:math> n≤ m , belong in a suitable Sobolev class and satisfy a certain distortion inequality for some smooth, closed and non-vanishing <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:math> n -form in <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {{R}}ᵐ . These mappings can be seen as quasiconformal mappings between <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> </m:math> Ω and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> f(Ω ) . We prove that a quasiconformal curve always satisfies the analytic definition of quasiconformal mappings and the lower half of the modulus inequality. Moreover, we give a sufficient condition for a quasiconformal curve to satisfy the metric definition of quasiconformal mappings. We also show that a quasiconformal map from <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> </m:math> Ω to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo>⊂</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> f(Ω )⊂ {{R}}ᵐ is a quasiconformal <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:math> ω curve for some form <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:math> ω under suitable assumptions. Finally, we show that same is true when
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hitruhin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: