Why the study?
Does posterior leaflet preservation improve survival or cardiac performance compared to chordal transection during mitral valve replacement in patients with severe rheumatic mitral insufficiency without left ventricular dysfunction?
Does posterior leaflet preservation improve survival or cardiac performance compared to chordal transection during mitral valve replacement in patients with severe rheumatic mitral insufficiency without left ventricular dysfunction?
In patients with severe rheumatic mitral insufficiency and preserved LV function, posterior leaflet preservation during mitral valve replacement does not appear to significantly improve long-term survival or cardiac performance compared to chordal transection.
Preservation of the mitral valve leaflet and tensor apparatus during valve replacement is believed to maintain left ventricular performance. To determine the effect of posterior leaflet preservation in pure severe mitral insufficiency without left ventricular dysfunction 56 patients were operated on between 1993 and 2000. Twenty-three patients underwent mitral valve replacement with posterior chordal preservation and 33 patients underwent mitral valve replacement with chordal transection. Preoperative data in the both groups were similar. After 30 days there were no mortalities observed. Dimensions of the left ventricle had significantly decreased within one group, but there was no difference in the other group. The improvement of the functional and cardiac performance in all patients was significant without any difference between the two groups. Actuarial freedom from death was not significantly different at 6 yr ( P = 0.23). To preserve left ventricular function in pure severe mitral regurgitation without left ventricular dysfunction, mitral valve replacement is very effective with or without posterior leaflet preservation. But, it is difficult to suggest that posterior leaflet preservation alone can increase cardiac performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kırali et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: