Why the study?
Does the RSWT feature combined with a random forest classifier accurately detect ECG characteristic points compared to existing algorithms?
Does the RSWT feature combined with a random forest classifier accurately detect ECG characteristic points compared to existing algorithms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proposed RSWT feature combined with a random forest classifier provides a robust and accurate machine learning-based method for the automatic and simultaneous detection of all types of ECG characteristic points.
Objective: Detection of Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristic points can provide critical diagnostic information about heart diseases. We proposed a novel feature extraction and machine learning scheme for automatic detection of ECG characteristic points. Methods: A new feature, termed as randomly selected wavelet transform (RSWT) feature, was devised to represent ECG characteristic points. A random forest classifier was adapted to infer the characteristic points position with high sensitivity and precision. Results: Compared with other state-of-the-art algorithms' testing results on QT database, our detection results of RSWT scheme showed comparable performance (similar sensitivity, precision, and detection error for each characteristic point). RSWT testing on MIT-BIH database also demonstrated promising cross-database performance. Conclusion: A novel RSWT feature and a new detection scheme was fabricated for ECG characteristic points. The RSWT demonstrated a robust and trustworthy feature for representing ECG morphologies. Significance: With the effectiveness of the proposed RSWT feature we presented a novel machine learning based scheme to automatically detect all types of ECG characteristic points at a time. Furthermore, it showed that our algorithm achieved better performance than other reported machine learning based methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: