Why the study?
The frequency of revisional bariatric surgery is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety are not yet fully established.
Does revisional bariatric surgery after failed adjustable gastric banding improve weight loss and comorbidities compared to primary bariatric surgery, and how do revisional RYGB and SG compare?
Does revisional bariatric surgery after failed adjustable gastric banding improve weight loss and comorbidities compared to primary bariatric surgery, and how do revisional RYGB and SG compare?
Revisional bariatric surgery after adjustable gastric banding is safe and effective, though primary procedures yield better weight loss, and revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass outperforms revisional sleeve gastrectomy in weight loss and dyslipidemia resolution.
Primary procedures show superior short-term weight loss and comorbidity resolution versus revisional after failed AGB; leaves open optimal strategy and long-term outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: The frequency of revisional bariatric surgery is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety are not yet fully established. The aim of our study was to compare short-term outcomes of primary (pRYGB and pSG) and revisional bariatric surgeries (rRYGB and rSG). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study assessing all patients submitted to primary and revisional (after a failed AGB) RYGB and SG in 2019. Each patient was followed-up at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. We compared pRYGB vs. rRYGB, pSG vs. rSG and rRYGB vs. rSG on weight loss, surgical complications, and resolution of comorbidities. RESULTS: We assessed 494 patients, of which 18.8% had undergone a revisional procedure. Higher weight loss at 6 and 12 months was observed in patients undergoing primary vs. revisional procedures. Patients submitted to rRYGB lost more weight than those with rSG (%EWL 12 months = 82.6% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.001). Regarding the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, diabetes resolution was more frequent in pRYGB than rRYGB (54.2% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.038). Also, 41.7% of the patients who underwent rRYGB had dyslipidemia resolution vs. 0% from the rSG group (p = 0.035). Dyslipidemia resolution was also more common in pSG vs. rSG (68.6% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.001). No significant differences in surgical complications were found. CONCLUSION: Revisional bariatric surgery is effective and safe treating obesity and related comorbidities after AGB. Primary procedures appear to be associated with better weight loss outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand the role of revisional bariatric surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos‐Sousa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: