Why the study?
Does irbesartan improve blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in postmenopausal women on a high-sodium diet?
Does irbesartan improve blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in postmenopausal women on a high-sodium diet?
Angiotensin II receptor blockade with irbesartan improves blood pressure and restores normal renal hemodynamic response to high sodium intake in postmenopausal women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports irbesartan for BP control and renal hemodynamics in high-sodium postmenopausal women; extends ARB evidence to this population.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension becomes increasingly prevalent after menopause. Postmenopausal women are more responsive to salt than premenopausal women, and they have been reported to develop marked renal vasoconstriction on a high-sodium diet. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether angiotensin II receptor blockade can restore a normal pattern of renal response to salt in postmenopausal women on a high-sodium diet. We also assessed segmental renal sodium handling in that population. METHODS: Normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. They were assigned to receive irbesartan 150 mg or placebo for 6 weeks; the sequence in which they received irbesartan or placebo was randomized. During the last week of treatment, they received a high-sodium diet (250 mmol/d). Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were measured using sinistrin and para-amino-hippurate clearances. Renal sodium handling was assessed by measuring endogenous lithium clearance on day 7 of the high-salt diet. RESULTS: Nineteen women (mean age, 54.7 years; range, 43-72 years; 7 normotensive subjects [mean age, 53.4 years; range, 47-61 years] and 12 hypertensive subjects [mean age, 55.4 years; range, 43-72 years]) were included in the study. When the data for all 19 subjects were pooled, ABP was significantly lower with irbesartan than placebo both during the day (120 [3]/79 [2] vs 127 [3]/85 [2] mm Hg; both, P < 0.01) and at night (systolic BP, 107 [4] vs 111 [4] mm Hg [P < 0.01] and diastolic BP, 71 [2] vs 75 [2] mm Hg [P < 0.05]). Compared with placebo, irbesartan was not associated with a significant change in GFR in either the normotensive or the hypertensive women. When the data for all 19 subjects were pooled, irbesartan was associated with a significant increase in ERPF compared with placebo (372 [21] vs324 [18] mL/min · 1.73 m(2); P < 0.05). When the hypertensive and normotensive women were considered separately, the effect was more pronounced in the hypertensive women than in the normotensive women, but the changes did not reach statistical significance. When the data for all subjects were pooled, irbesartan was associated with a significant increase in daytime urinary sodium excretion compared with placebo (135 [13] vs 106 [13] μmol/min; P < 0.05) and a significant decrease at night (109 [13] vs 136 [19] μmol/min; P < 0.05). Fractional excretion of lithium (FELi), an inverse marker of proximal sodium reabsorption, increased significantly during the daytime with irbesartan compared with placebo (47% [6.5%] vs 35% [4.7%]; P < 0.05). At nighttime, FELi was significantly higher in the hypertensive subjects receiving irbesartan compared with placebo (43% [7.2%] vs 29% [6.5%]; P < 0.05). The fractional distal reabsorption of sodium did not change significantly with irbesartan compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that angiotensin II receptor blockade had a favorable impact on BP, renal hemodynamics, and renal sodium handling in these salt-replete postmenopausal women. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system restored the normal pattern of renal response to high sodium intake in these women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Péchère-Bertschi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: