Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the acute effects and safety of blood flow restriction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle strength, thigh circumference, and knee joint reposition sense in female amateur football players.
Does blood flow restriction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve muscle strength, thigh circumference, and knee joint reposition sense in female amateur football players compared to neuromuscular electrical stimulation alone?
Does blood flow restriction combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve muscle strength, thigh circumference, and knee joint reposition sense in female amateur football players compared to neuromuscular electrical stimulation alone?
The addition of blood flow restriction to neuromuscular electrical stimulation does not provide immediate additional benefits for muscle strength, thigh circumference, or proprioception in female amateur football players.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute NMES+BFR may be safe in female athletes; leaves open efficacy for strength or proprioception with repeated use.
We aimed to investigate the acute effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on muscle strength, thigh circumference, and knee joint reposition sense in female amateur football players, as well as to determine whether this procedure is safe. Methods: This was a pilot trial. Twenty female amateur football players were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 10) received a single NMES session; group 2 (n = 10) received NMES + BFR. The measured variables included maximal voluntary eccentric contraction (MVEC) and maximal voluntary concentric contraction (MVCC), thigh circumference, and knee joint reposition sense test. The type of electrical current used was TENS (symmetrical biphasic rectangular pulse, 350 μs, and 50 Hz), combined simultaneously with active knee extension (75 repetitions in 4 sets, 20% MVCC, 30 s rest between sets), for both groups. Group 2 had BFR added (80% of arterial occlusion pressure). Results: Statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were obtained for thigh circumference in both groups. The comparison between groups did not show statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in MVEC, MVCC, thigh circumference, or the knee joint reposition sense test. Conclusions: Both the isolated NMES intervention and its combination with BFR induced immediate changes in thigh circumference without impairing the muscle strength or proprioceptive ability of the football players. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, and future studies including a control group and isolated BFR application are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afán-Argüín et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: