Why the study?
How do lidocaine and quinidine affect the steady-state characteristics and recovery kinetics of (dV/dt)max in guinea pig ventricular myocardium?
How do lidocaine and quinidine affect the steady-state characteristics and recovery kinetics of (dV/dt)max in guinea pig ventricular myocardium?
Lidocaine and quinidine influence the maximum rate of rise of the action potential through different mechanisms, which may underlie their distinct clinical electrophysiological effects.
Differential effects on sodium channel kinetics may underlie distinct clinical actions; hypothesis-generating from animal data and leaves open human translation.
We studied the effects of quinidine and lidocaine on the steady-state relationship between membrane potential and the maximum rate of rise of the action potential, (dV/dt)max, and on the recovery kinetics of (dV/dt)max in guinea pig papillary muscles. The steady-state relationships were determined in fibers stimulated at 0.2/sec and depolarized with KCl. Recovery kinetics were determined at various resting membrane potentials by assessing (dV/dt)max in progressively earlier premature action potentials. Lidocaine caused a dose-dependent decrease in (dV/dt)max, shifted the curve defining the steady-state relationship along the voltage axis in the direction of more negative potentials, and slowed the recovery kinetics of (dV/dt)max. Quinidine caused a dose-dependent decrease in (dV/dt)max but did not alter the shape of the curves defining either the steady-state relationship or the recovery kinetics of (dV/dt)max. Both drugs depressed membrane responsiveness as determined in premature action potentials originating from incompletely repolarized fibers. Our study indicates that the mechanisms whereby quinidine and lidocaine influence (dV/dt)max are different. It is possible that this difference may underlie some of the differences in the clinical effects of these two drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: