Why the study?
Does the potential gradient field distribution determine where shocks fail to halt fibrillation in a canine model?
Population
Six open-chest dogs
Comparison
1 to 2 V shocks and high-voltage shocks just… vs Comparison between RA.V and RV.LV electrode…
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
May explain shock failure sites via weak gradients in canines; leaves open optimal electrode configurations for clinical defibrillation.
Does the potential gradient field distribution determine where shocks fail to halt fibrillation in a canine model?
The potential gradient field for epicardial defibrillation electrodes is markedly uneven, and areas with weak gradients are the earliest sites of activation after unsuccessful shocks, suggesting electrode locations should be optimized to improve defibrillation.
Chen et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: