Key result
Intravascular sonotherapy reduces 28-day percent stenosis by ~8 percentage points vs. sham in swine.
RCT (n=14)
Stented sites randomized to sonotherapy or sham treatment
Randomized animal study shows intravascular sonotherapy reduces smooth muscle proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia in stented swine arteries, suggesting a nonionizing method to prevent restenosis.
BACKGROUND: Intimal hyperplasia and subsequent in-stent restenosis remain a major limitation after stent implantation. In vitro cell culture studies show that low-frequency, noncavitational ultrasound energy may impact smooth muscle cell proliferation. Accordingly, we assessed the efficacy of intravascular sonotherapy treatment on intimal hyperplasia in a swine stent model. METHODS AND RESULTS: After balloon injury, biliary stents (Johnson & Johnson) were implanted in the femoral arteries of 14 swine. A total of 48 stented sites were randomized to sonotherapy or sham treatment using a custom-built, 8-French catheter intravascular sonotherapy system (URX, PharmaSonics Inc). After stent deployment, ultrasound energy (700 KHz) was applied to the treatment group for up to 5 minutes. Smooth muscle cell proliferation was assessed using bromodeoxyuridine histology preparation (BrdU) at 7 days in 28 stented sites. At 28 days, the neointimal thickness and the ratio of neointimal/stent area (percent stenosis) was calculated by histomorphometric quantification in 20 stented sites. At 7 days, percent of BrdU staining was significantly reduced in the sonotherapy group compared with the sham group (24.1+/-7.0% versus 31.2+/-3.0%, P<0.05). At 28 days, percent stenosis was significantly less in the sonotherapy group than in the sham group (36+/-24% versus 44+/-27%, P<0.05), and the mean neointimal thickness in the sonotherapy group was less than in the sham group (417+/-461 micrometer versus 643+/-869 micrometer, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In this swine peripheral model, intravascular sonotherapy seemed to decelerate cellular proliferation and decrease in-stent hyperplasia. Therefore, intravascular sonotherapy may be an effective form of nonionizing energy to reduce in-stent restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitzgerald et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis after stent implantation (n=14). Intravascular sonotherapy vs. Sham treatment was evaluated on Percent stenosis (ratio of neointimal/stent area) at 28 days (p=<0.05). Intravascular sonotherapy significantly reduced 28-day percent stenosis compared with sham treatment (36% vs 44%, P<0.05) and 7-day smooth muscle cell proliferation (24.1% vs 31.2%, P<0.05) in swine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: