Why the study?
Does intracaval ultrasonography improve diagnostic accuracy for tumour involvement of the vena cava compared to computed tomography and cavography in patients with possible tumour involvement?
Does intracaval ultrasonography improve diagnostic accuracy for tumour involvement of the vena cava compared to computed tomography and cavography in patients with possible tumour involvement?
Intracaval ultrasonography provides highly accurate evaluation of vena cava tumour invasion, outperforming conventional CT and cavography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid vena cava tumour assessment in select cases; supports prospective validation but should not yet change practice.
A retrospective study of 34 consecutive patients with possible tumour involvement of the vena cava was performed to assess the usefulness of intracaval ultrasonography. Twenty-five of the 34 patients were operated and resection carried out in 23, including seven with combined resection of the vena cava. The sonographic criterion for vena cava invasion was obliteration of the echogenic ring of the vena cava wall or intracaval tumour mass. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of intracaval endovascular ultrasonography in the diagnosis of tumour involvement of the vena cava were 100, 96 and 97 per cent respectively. The respective values were 91, 61 and 71 per cent for computed tomography and 82, 67 and 72 per cent for cavography. Ultrasonography is a useful technique that can precisely evaluate the vena cava for possible tumour invasion, especially when the presence or extent of tumour involvement is not definitely established by conventional imaging techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: