Why the study?
Do echo-derived hemodynamic profiles combined with BNP levels predict survival in outpatients with chronic HFrEF?
Do echo-derived hemodynamic profiles combined with BNP levels predict survival in outpatients with chronic HFrEF?
Combining echo-derived hemodynamic profiles (cardiac index and E/e') with BNP levels provides strong prognostic stratification for long-term survival in outpatients with chronic HFrEF.
May support integrated echo-BNP-CI profiling for HF prognostication; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Doppler echocardiography is useful for noninvasive determination of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) by the ratio of mitral E peak velocity and averaged e' velocity (E/e') and it can also provide reliable and repeatable measures of cardiac index (CI): this information can be used to identify hemodynamic profiles. Integration of echocardiographic estimates of LVFP with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) circulating levels and measures of CI can be utilized to predict outcome of heart failure (HF) patients in an ambulatory setting. Aim: We analysed different hemodynamic profiles based on echo assessment of LVFP and CI, together with BNP levels, to risk stratify patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: A population of 310 outpatients (age: 66±12 years, EF: 33±8) with chronic HFrEF were classified according to the echo-derived hemodynamic profile: A) well-perfused, without congestion: CI ≥2.0 l/min/m2 and E/e'<13; B) low-perfused, without congestion: CI <2.0 l/min/m2 and E/e'<13; C) well-perfused and congested: CI ≥2.0 l/min/m2 and E/e'≥13; D) hypo-perfused and congested: CI <2.0 l/min/m2 and E/e'≥13. The best outcome was observed in patients with profile A (90% survival at 60-months), while profile D was associated to the worst prognosis (54%; p<0.0001). In order to assess whether the predictive value of hemodynamic profiles was improved by the assessment of BNP, patients were further stratified according to BNP levels (Figure). Patients with profile A and BNP <150 pg/ml had a 94% survival at follow-up (p<0.0001). Moreover, BNP >150 mpg/ml provided additional information (c2=51.9; p=0.005) to an interactive stepwise model that included demographic and clinical parameters (c2=30.6), EF<30% (c2=37.6; p=0.003) and hemodynamic profile D (c2=48.8; p=0.007).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pugliese et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: