Why the study?
Does epicardial adipose tissue thickness correlate with coronary atherosclerosis severity and carotid intima-media thickness in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Does epicardial adipose tissue thickness correlate with coronary atherosclerosis severity and carotid intima-media thickness in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Epicardial adipose tissue thickness measured by echocardiography correlates significantly with angiographic coronary artery disease severity and carotid intima-media thickness, suggesting its utility as a non-invasive bedside marker for atherosclerotic burden.
EAT thickness may aid noninvasive atherosclerosis assessment; leaves open its incremental predictive value in prospective studies.
Purpose Major burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality around the globe is due to atherosclerosis and its complications. Hence its early detection and management with easily accessible and non-invasive methods is valuable. Epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EAT) through transthoracic two dimensional (2D) echocardiography determines highly active intrathoracic visceral adipose tissue burden which increases atherosclerosis . 1 We did this study to find the utility of EAT in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) burden and compare with carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) which is an established surrogate marker of atherosclerosis. Methods In this cross-sectional comparative study, we measured EAT by 2D echocardiography and CIMT by B-mode ultrasound in 161 patients, who underwent coronary angiogram (CAG) for various clinical indications. Coronary artery disease was considered significant if more than 70% diameter stenosis is present in any epicardial coronary artery and insignificant if otherwise. Results On coronary aniography (CAG) 65.2% of patients had significant CAD, 24.3% had insignificant disease and 10.5% had normal coronaries. Epicardial adipose tissue was 0.59 ± 0.26 cm in normal coronary artery group, 0.61 ± 0.20 cm in insignificant CAD group and 0.72 ± 0.19 cm in significant CAD group ( p < 0.05) and CIMT was 0.54 ± 0.15 mm, 0.61 ± 0.13 mm and 0.65 ± 0.15 mm in normal coronaries group, insignificant CAD group and significant CAD group respectively ( p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between EAT and CIMT. Results showed a significant positive relationship between EAT and CIMT. ( r = 0.183, p = <0.01, N = 161). The results also showed a significant positive relationship between EAT and SYNTAX score ( r = 0.290, p = <0.01, N = 161) and a significant positive relationship between EAT and Gensini score ( r = 0.209, p = <0.01, N = 161). Conclusions EAT and CIMT can predict CAD burden in a robust way. EAT may emerge as an exquisite bedside tool to predict atherosclerotic burden and guide to implement preventive therapy for cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaitanya et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: