Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve or reduce long-term survival and freedom from reintervention compared to on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated multivessel bypass?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve or reduce long-term survival and freedom from reintervention compared to on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated multivessel bypass?
Off-pump CABG does not adversely impact 10-year survival or freedom from reintervention compared to on-pump CABG in patients undergoing isolated multivessel bypass.
Off-pump CABG was associated with similar 10-year outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Recently published evidence has raised concerns about worse late mortality and increasing need for reintervention after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. We undertook this study to assess the impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on survival and freedom from reintervention at 10 years. From January 2002 to December 2002, 307 consecutive patients who had isolated multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution were compared to a control group of 397 patients that underwent multivessel on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting during the same period. In addition, univariate and risk-adjusted comparisons between the two groups were performed at 10 years. Kaplan-Meier survival was similar for the two cohorts. After adjusting for clinical covariates, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting did not emerge as a significant independent predictor of long-term mortality (Hazard Ratio 0.91; 95% Confidence Interval 0.70-1.12), readmission to hospital for cardiac cause (Hazard Ratio 0.96; 95% Confidence Interval 0.78-1.10), or the need for reintervention (Hazard Ratio 0.93; 95% Confidence Interval 0.87-1.05). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not adversely impact survival or freedom from reintervention at a 10-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raja et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: