Why the study?
Does examination by trained sonographers using hand-held ultrasound devices provide reliable cardiac dimensions and valvular regurgitation assessment compared to certified cardiologists using standard platforms in patients referred for routine echocardiography?
Does examination by trained sonographers using hand-held ultrasound devices provide reliable cardiac dimensions and valvular regurgitation assessment compared to certified cardiologists using standard platforms in patients referred for routine echocardiography?
Hand-held ultrasound devices used by trained sonographers provide accurate and reliable basic cardiac dimensions and valvular regurgitation assessments compared to standard echocardiography by cardiologists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support sonographer use of hand-held devices for basic assessments; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
AIM: We sought to assess the reliability of some basic echocardiographic data obtained by trained sonographers using a hand-held ultrasound device. METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients (mean age 61, 64 males) referred for in-hospital or ambulatory routine echocardiography were considered. All patients underwent two-dimensional and colour Doppler examination performed by a trained sonographer equipped with a hand-held ultrasound device and by a certified cardiologist equipped with a standard platform, in random order. Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic transverse diameters, aortic root, end-systolic left atrium transverse diameter, end-diastolic interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness were calculated by two-dimensional left parasternal long-axis view in blind conditions. Mitral and aortic valve regurgitation were investigated by colour-Doppler imaging on parasternal and apical views and compared using a 0 to 4 semi-quantitative score. RESULTS: Overall feasibility was high for both settings (sonographers: 93%; cardiologists: 95%; P not significant). Excellent concordance of end-diastolic diameter (kappa 0.75), left atrium (kappa 0.76) and interventricular septum thickness (kappa 0.77) results was found. Good concordance was observed for end-systolic diameter (kappa 0.66), aortic root (kappa 0.64) and posterior wall thickness (kappa 0.67) results. A high linear correlation between the couples of results was present for all parameters. A good agreement of the mitral (kappa 0.66) and aortic (kappa 0.84) regurgitation scores was also found, with a low prevalence of discordant results (mitral regurgitation: 22%, aortic regurgitation: 9%) and no > or =2-point discrepancies. CONCLUSION: In a general population referred for Doppler echocardiography, basic cardiac linear dimensions and valvular regurgitation severity assessment by trained sonographers using hand-held ultrasound devices appear accurate and reliable for routine clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coletta et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: