Why the study?
As 30-year survival after Fontan nears 90%, clinicians increasingly encounter Fontan circulatory failure, prompting the need for a pragmatic functional grading framework and comprehensive management guidance.
Population
Adults living with a Fontan circulation
Design
Clinical panel review and pragmatic grading framework
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers a structured Fontan failure assessment framework; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
As 30-year survival after Fontan nears 90%, clinicians increasingly encounter Fontan circulatory failure. This panel introduces a pragmatic Fontan circulation function grading framework with red-flag triggers to prompt timely reassessment. Pathophysiology and management of key drivers and consequences of Fontan circulatory failure are outlined, including ventricular dysfunction/heart failure, arrhythmias, pulmonary vascular remodeling, lymphatic dysfunction, thromboembolism, and pathway obstruction. Considerations for pharmacologic, catheter-based, surgical, and transplant strategies are outlined. Comprehensive care is summarized across nutrition, endocrine-metabolic and bone health, mental health and neurocognition, and sexual and reproductive health, including pregnancy risk. Future directions emphasize multicenter registries and learning-health systems, standardized outcome measures, invasive exercise hemodynamics, advanced imaging and biomarker programs. We highlight emerging therapies, such as image-guided lymphatic interventions, cavopulmonary assist devices, optimized heart ± liver transplantation, and targeted/repurposed pharmacotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grewal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: