Why the study?
Although CCTA is useful for risk stratification in patients with diabetes, limited data exist regarding its prognostic value in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic individuals undergoing CCTA, and can CCTA effectively stratify this risk?
Does the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic individuals undergoing CCTA, and can CCTA effectively stratify this risk?
Asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes have a significantly higher risk of cardiac events compared to matched non-diabetics, and CCTA findings such as obstructive stenosis and proximal plaques effectively stratify this risk.
CCTA may refine CAD risk stratification in asymptomatic T2DM; leaves open whether it improves outcomes versus standard care.
Background: Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is useful for risk stratification in patients with diabetes, limited data is available regarding its prognostic value in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DMs).Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the utility of CCTA in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk stratification in T2DMs compared to that in patients without diabetes mellitus (non-DMs).Methods: We selected 565 T2DMs and 1,130 non-DMs using propensity score matching from the Evaluation of Subclinical Coronary atherosclerosis for Risk Stratification Using the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (ESCORT) study of 5,142 asymptomatic individuals.We evaluated CCTA findings and confirmed the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) and total cardiac events (TCE; MACE plus coronary revascularization) during follow-up using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Results: Over a median follow-up of 47 months, MACE and TCE occurred significantly more in T2DMs than in non-DMs (4.2% vs. 1.7% and 7.8% vs. 4.3%, respectively, all P < 0.001).The Cox regression model identified T2DMs, obstructive stenosis, and proximally located plaques as independent predictors of MACE and TCE (all P < 0.05).Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that survival rate was dependent on stenosis grade (log-rank P < 0.001) and differed significantly in the presence of T2DMs among patients with obstructive stenosis (P < 0.05).Conclusion: While diabetes is an independent risk factor for CAD, its impact on survival rate varies with the severity of CAD, highlighting the value of CCTA as a prognostic tool for CAD risk stratification in asymptomatic T2DMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: